The technical gap
in Article 15
compliance.
Why EU AI Act Article 15 requires specialised robustness and cybersecurity testing beyond governance consulting, and what evidence mapped to Article 15 actually looks like, for the security team that has to produce it and the board that has to trust it.
What the whitepaper covers.
- Why Article 15 requires specialized technical testing
- How independent robustness and cybersecurity testing is performed
- Mapping attack categories (prompt injection, data poisoning, model theft) to Article 15 clauses
- Sample finding structure and evidence requirements
- How to evaluate technical testing partners
- Checklist: components regulators expect in Article 15 reports
Written for the four people on the Article 15 call.
Plain language, technical depth where it matters. Designed to be forwarded inside your organisation without a translator.
US companies expanding into Europe
Teams preparing for Article 15 conformity ahead of the 2026–2027 enforcement window.
EMEA enterprises
Compliance teams readying high-risk AI portfolios for EU AI Act filing.
Compliance consultants
Advisors scoping engagements for clients facing Article 15 obligations.
CISOs, CTOs & Legal counsel
The people accountable for AI risk reporting inside the organisation.
Six conversations it settles.
Ready to file,
not read?
The whitepaper is for context. If you need Article 15 evidence on your desk, an independent audit is the next call.